Catherine Deneuve: Timeless icon of the 60s continues to radiate elegance and beauty

0

Catherine Deneuve, who achieved global stardom in the 1960s with her starring role in Jacques Demy’s colorful musical The Umbrellas of Cherbourg (1964) and her chilling performance in Roman Polanski’s Repulsion (1965), has been hailed as the very essence of French elegance in the world of cinema.

Deneuve, 82, was born into a family of actors. She had her debut in 1957, landing a role in the French film The Twilight Girls.

Following her role in The Umbrellas of Cherbourg, one of the many films of Jacques Demy in which she would take part through her illustrious career, her acting skills would catch the attention of renowned filmmaker Roman Polanski. With her role of Carol, a woman suffering from violent schizophrenia, in the psychological thriller Repulsion, Deneuve established herself as the “ice maiden” type.

Later on, she continued to reinforce this image in Belle de Jour, in which she portrayed a bourgeois housewife with a secret profession as a prostitute.

In 1967, Deneuve starred in The Young Girls of Rochefort along with her sister who was just a year older than her. However, despite they weren’t twins in real life, the sisters were so much alike that it wasn’t hard to portray twin sisters on screen.

Sadly, three months after the release of the film, Catherine Deneuve’s sister, Françoise Dorléac, who was 25 at the time, was killed in a car crash.

“The day I lost my sister, I lost my joy of living…it is the most painful thing that I have experienced,” the actress said in an interview with Paris Match, a weekly French magazine.

Juergen Vollmer/Popperfoto/Getty Images

Over the course of her career, Deneuve starred in over 120 films. Speaking of how the industry has changed over the years, she said in an interview with The Talks, “Human nature is a very wide thing. There are roles that are more in relation with people of my generation. When you grow older in life, it’s the same thing. You have an experience and a type of character that you cannot play if you are 30, let’s say.

“It’s difficult to find a good path. You can grow older better in Europe than in America, that’s for sure. But women seem to be younger than they were 50 years ago. It’s the evolution of human beings, ah? 40 years ago, when you see a 50-year-old woman, she looked her age. Today, much less.”

Deneuve only landed roles in a handful of English movies, including The April Fools (1969) with Jack Lemmon, Hustle (1973) with Burt Reynolds, March or Die (1977) with Gene Hackman, and the 1983 cult favorite The Hunger alongside David Bowie and Susan Sarandon.

She also explained why she mainly stared in French films. “I feel very French, but I speak Italian and English, so I feel very European. But I don’t feel close to English people, for example. It’s not that far away geographically, but I don’t feel close to English people because it’s such a different sensibility, such different characters.”

She added, “We are so different. I feel closer to Spanish or Italian people than to English people. Because of the nature of the Latin character compared to an Anglo-Saxon character. We have different educations… we are very different.”

In 1965, she married David Bailey, a British photographer whom she met at a Playboy shoot. The couple divorced in 1972, the same year she welcomed a daughter with Italian actor Marcello Mastroianni.

In 1980, Deneuve teamed up with Gérard Depardieu in The Last Metro, a collaboration that quickly became one of French cinema’s most celebrated pairings. It was the first time they worked together, and definitely not the last, as they would go on to make 15 films as co-stars.

Deneuve later explained that their connection came down to instinct. Neither liked to over-rehearse, they just showed up and responded to the moment.

In the early ’90s, she hit another major milestone with Indochine, which brought her an Oscar nomination, a César Award, and international acclaim when the film won Best Foreign Language Film.

In the 2000s, Deneuve continued taking on fresh roles, including the acclaimed musical drama Dancer in the Dark opposite Björk, and later Potiche, her eighth film with Gérard Depardieu.

After appearing in The Truth, she briefly paused work due to a health scare while filming Peaceful, before returning to the set the following year.

Today, at the age of 82, Catherine Deneuve is still going strong.

Please SHARE this article with your family and friends on Facebook.

Bored Daddy

Love and Peace

Congresswoman claims she possesses her own list of names from the full Epstein files, saying it will ‘shock’ the public

0

Lawmakers reviewed unredacted versions of several records in the Jeffrey Epstein files and pressured the Justice Department on Monday to un-redact more names.

From Monday onwards, members of Congress have been granted the opportunity to review the more than 3 million pages of documents that were recently made public by the Department of Justice under the Epstein Files Transparency Act. However, Rep. Jamie Raskin expressed concern about the extremely limited access to the documents, noting that members of Congress can review them on only four computers in a DOJ satellite office.

Rep. Raskin said that “it’s not explained yet why there might be certain redactions that have been made.

“So, I went over there, and I was able to determine, at least, I believe, that there were tons of completely unnecessary redactions in addition to the failure to redact the names of victims, and so that’s troubling to us,” Raskin said Monday, ABC reported.

“I saw the names of lots of people who were redacted for mysterious or baffling or inscrutable reasons,” he added.

Martin BUREAU / AFP via Getty Images

On the same day, Republican Rep. Thomas Massie and Democratic Rep. Ro Khanna, who co-authored the Epstein Files Transparency Act and have both reviewed the unredacted documents, expressed concern that some men’s names may have been accidentally redacted.

Currently, it is not known what the specific activities or connections these men may have had to the unredacted documents that the lawmakers were able to review.

Rep. Khanna read out the names of six people who had been previously redacted in the Epstein files during a floor speech on Tuesday, after visiting the Department of Justice where he and Rep. Thomas Massie spent two hours reviewing the documents.

The six men identified by Khanna, as reported by The Guardian, are Leslie Wexner, founder of Victoria’s Secret; Sultan Ahmed bin Sulayem, CEO of DP World; Nicola Caputo; Salvatore Nuara; Zurab Mikeladze; and Leonic Leonov.

Khanna also expressed concern that the DOJ may have over-redacted women’s names in the files, noting that some were hidden simply because they were female. “Just because, for example, someone is female doesn’t necessarily mean they’re survivors. And it seemed like they blanket redacted anyone who was a female from my review,” he said.

Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images

Now, Congresswoman Nancy Mace says she has her own list of people who have been found to be redacted, and she wants to know why.

“I took a lot of notes. I saw a lot of names,” she said during Katie Pavlich Tonight on Tuesday.

“I wanted to look at the documents of the people who have not been arrested or investigated. A lot of that information is still redacted.”

Mace said she has found the names of women who were potential co-conspirators of Epstein and may have been providing women to him.

She said they were “adult women who were recruiting young women and potentially underage individuals to give to Jeffrey Epstein,” adding: “Really disgusting behavior.

“These are people that I want to have brought in, tesitfy and answer some very tough questions.

“I’m very concerned as a survivor about protecting the personal information, the names of underage children of some of these women that was put out in the public,” Mace went on to explain. “And it’s also, it’s shaming. It’s victim shaming.”

Jeffrey Epstein/ New York State Sex Offender Registry

Although she claims that not all people she recognized in the files had evidence against them of wrongdoing, there are allegations being raised about their association with Epstein.

“I saw some names in there, people that I had no idea would be in the files, who were scheduling lunch or meetings with a convicted pedophile. Didn’t do anything wrong, but certainly you question, ‘Wow, why are all these people, rich and powerful and famous, Hollywood, et cetera, doing this?’” she said.

In the end, both Rep. Ro Khanna and Rep. Nancy Mace are calling for greater transparency in the Epstein files. Together, their efforts underline the ongoing push for accountability and a clearer picture of Epstein’s network.

Please SHARE this article with your family and friends on Facebook.

Bored Daddy

Love and Peace

New research reveals key brain development changes before birth may influence the risk of autism and schizophrenia

0

We tend to turn our attention to the brain and its function only when certain problems start to appear. It could be when a child starts struggling at school, or an adult starts feeling lost in their own thoughts, or simply when behavior seems out of sync with what’s expected.

It is in moments like these that we start looking for patterns and explanations. Yet, a new research reveals that much of who we are may have been shaped long before any of these issues could be observed.

Well before we started to speak, our memory could stick, or a “sense of I” could be born, the roots of our thinking, feeling, and doing were being laid. To understand the mind may be, in part, to realize not only where it fails us now but also how the early pages of our lives, even before birth, begin to dictate what is to come.

Neurodevelopmental disorders, including autism and schizophrenia, are commonly talked about years after the onset of the first symptoms, whether it’s the struggle in school for the child with autism or the alterations in perception, thought, and social connection for the person with schizophrenia.

However, recent research is moving the onset of these disorders from years after birth to the first weeks in the womb.

Scientists at the University of Exeter have produced a list that explains the process of the chemical changes in our DNA and how they occur in the development and aging of the human brain. This has given us further insight into the possible ways in which autism and schizophrenia could be developing in the brain.

The scientists researched the process of something called epigenetic changes, which are basically chemical changes that occur in the DNA in our brain. These changes are very important in the development of the brain because they tell the brain cells what to do and help the different areas of the brain work correctly.

Shutterstock

One of the changes the researchers focused on is something called DNA methylation. The researchers were able to study almost 1,000 human brains that were donated to the study. The study included all stages of life, from six weeks after conception until the age of 108. The researchers focused particularly on the cortex, which is the part of the brain that controls thinking, memory, perception, and behavior. It is very important that the cortex is functioning correctly from the early stages of brain development in order for the brain to be healthy throughout our lifetime.

A new study published in the journal Cell Genomics reveals that the chemical switches on our genes, known as DNA methylation, are in a state of flux even before we are born. These changes play a crucial role in the activation of crucial biological pathways in the development of the cortex of the brain. What’s even more intriguing is the fact that the development of the DNA methylation patterns in the neurons of the brain, which are the primary signaling cells of the brain, begins very early on in development and makes them stand out from the rest of the cells in the brain.

The most intriguing part of the study is the fact that the genes which are linked to autism and schizophrenia are subject to the greatest changes in DNA methylation patterns in the early stages of development. This shows that the development of the cortex of the brain is crucially dependent on these genes, and any interruption in the process could lead to the development of the aforementioned mental health disorders.

Alice Franklin, from the University of Exeter, who is first author on the study said: “By analysing how chemical changes to DNA shape the brain across the human lifespan, we’ve uncovered important clues about why neurodevelopmental conditions like autism and schizophrenia may develop. Our findings highlight that their roots may lie very early on in brain development.”

From the very beginning of a baby’s development, the brain develops a highly coordinated and well-timed blueprint to determine how different areas of the brain will develop and become connected. Before a baby even begins to think, act, or display personality, the outer layer of the brain, or the cortex, begins to develop in layers, with each cell having a purpose based on its position and timing of development. As it is obvious, even a small change during this time could have a great impact, as much of the rest of the development depends on this process.

At this point, it is not about behavior or personality; it is about developing the structure of the brain. The cells have to know where to go, when to multiply, and how to prepare to communicate with other parts of the brain. There are biological signals inside the body, and these signals are like instructions, ensuring everything develops in the correct sequence. If these instructions change even slightly, the structure of the entire brain could develop, but it could function differently later on.

Why Epigenetics Matters for Autism and Schizophrenia

While genetic research managed to identify a number of variants that are associated with autism and schizophrenia, these variants alone don’t answer the question of why some individuals develop these disorders and others don’t. In fact, many of the same genetic markers are also present at people who have never been diagnosed with autism or schizophrenia, which forced researchers to focus on epigenetics in order to get a better understanding of how genetic risks affect biology.

Essentially, epigenetics is the system that regulates the way in which genes behave without actually altering the DNA sequence itself. In the brain, these processes determine when and where particular genes are turned on, ensuring that brain development remains coordinated throughout the process of brain growth and change. Rather than simply turning genes on or off, epigenetics is like a dimmer switch, making subtle adjustments in the way in which genes behave. This influences the way in which brain systems initially develop and the way in which they respond later in life to experience, learning, and the environment.

In relation to autism and schizophrenia, epigenetics provides a way of thinking about a set of issues that is beyond the simple notion that they are inherited or “hard-wired.” It provides a way of thinking about how genetic vulnerabilities interact with the biological environment, not all at once, but over a period of time. This helps to explain why traits associated with autism and schizophrenia tend to emerge gradually, and why they vary so greatly from person to person.

Looking at something in this way helps to reinforce a non-deterministic approach to understanding risk. To say that you are vulnerable to something because of a biological factor does not mean that you are locked into a particular outcome, but rather that there are a number of possibilities.

The University of Exeter study in particular focuses in on the specifics of DNA methylation because it is one of the best understood and most researched of the epigenetic markers in the brain tissue of humans. By determining what the typical pattern of DNA methylation looks like at various stages of brain development, the researchers are in effect creating a sort of guide.

This allows future researchers to take a closer look at the regulation of genetic risk in the cortex, rather than the location of the risk itself. It also allows researchers to gain a deeper understanding of what goes wrong when the regulation does not occur in the expected manner.

It’s not difficult to misinterpret research findings that try to relate prenatal brain development to neurological differences that show up later in life. This is especially true when the research deals with conditions such as autism or schizophrenia, as these are already somewhat mysterious to most people. Therefore, the research suggests that people should try to read these findings in terms of what they show, rather than what they appear to suggest at first glance. The research suggests that early brain development seems to have an impact on later outcomes, as well as the fact that there’s a strong relationship between epigenetics and genes that have to do with autism or schizophrenia. This research helps to show that neurological differences begin early, though they do this slowly and in ways that change.

However, the study does not suggest that biology during early development controls the course of a person’s life.

There is no single epigenetic mark that would tell if a child would develop autism or schizophrenia. Prenatal factors are part of a much broader picture.

There is also great care taken by the researchers to address the concerns parents and caregivers might have when they read the results. It is only logical to wonder if there could be long-term effects from the experiences during pregnancy, but the researchers want to make it clear that the results are not about control or blame. Epigenetics is not about being certain; it is about being sensitive.

A generation of research on human development reveals that the brain remains malleable even after birth. The years of early childhood, in fact, represent a peak in malleability, influenced by care and learning opportunities, and the broader social world around us. From this point of view, prenatal biology provides the foundation for human development, but not the outcome.

The practical importance of this research, then, is not to improve prediction, but to inform our understanding and support. By appreciating the early vulnerabilities and the lifelong malleability, scientists are working to develop a more accurate and compassionate model of human neurodevelopment.

Please SHARE this article with your family and friends on Facebook.

Bored Daddy

Love and Peace

The billionaire’s daughter was given only three months to live—until the new housekeeper uncovered a shocking truth

0

Following his wife’s sudden passing, Richard wasn’t the same man any longer. His entire life turned upside down, and he no longer spent his days attending meetings and answering calls.

No one inside the Wakefield mansion dared to say it out loud, but everyone could feel it. Richard’s daughter, Luna Wakefield, was fading away.

The little girl suffered from a medical condition that left her with three months to live.

Richard, who was a company owner and a multimillionaire, stared at his daughter but couldn’t do anything to help her. In moments like that, he knew money couldn’t buy everything.

The mansion was enormous. And it was rather quiet, but not in a way that makes you feel peaceful. No. On the contrary, that silence made everyone feel guilt for no particular reason. And yes, that mansion was filled with the best of the best. There were private doctors, state-of-the-art medical equipment, rotating nursing staff, therapy animals, gentle music, books, imported toys, bright blankets, and walls painted in Luna’s favorite color.

Sadly, the only thing that really mattered wasn’t there. And that was Luna’s mental presence.

Her eyes were always distant and unfocused. It seemed as though she stared at nothing particular, and seeing her like that broke Richard’s heart into a million pieces over and over again. His face was no longer part of the magazine covers, and his “empire” could now survive without him. He needed to be there for Luna, despite her not even being aware he was right by her side.

He started every day with the same routine. He’s prepare breakfast for his daughter, despite there were plenty of staff at the house and the kitchen who could do that instead of him. However, Luna would barely touch the breakfast, and it went on every single morning.

Next, Richard would give her the medications. Luna took plenty of meds prescribed by one of the best private doctors there was, Dr. Atticus Morrow, who was overseeing Luna’s care.

Richard would write down any change in his daughter’s behavior, even the slightest one. His notebook was filled with a bunch of notes he went through over and over again, hoping to notice a change that could help with her treatment.

But Luna barely spoke. She even barely nodded. All she did was staring at the window. Her father spoke to her anyway. He shared stories, made promises he knew he wouldn’t fulfill, and invented all sorts of fairy tales he believed Luna would like. Sadly, the distance between them was getting broader with each passing day.

But then, Julia Bennett arrived.

Julia was a woman who had experienced loss. Her newborn baby died, and she was never the same ever since that tragedy took place. So when she saw the advert in the newspaper that Mr. Wakefield was looking for a housekeeper, she thought there was nothing she could lose. The advert asked for someone to tend a large house, light duties, and to take care for a sick child. Because of reasons she couldn’t explain, Julia’s chests tightened. It felt as though life was offering her a second chance not to drown in grief.

She applied and got the job.

She was kind and calm, and Richard explained her the rules: distance, respect, discretion.

Julia was assigned a guest room at the far end of the house, where she placed down her simple suitcase like someone trying not to take up space. She spent the first couple of days observing the place.

Julia moved silently through the room. She started tidying, straightening up, assisting the nurses with their supplies. She pulled back the curtains, added flowers in soft shades, routinely folded the quilts. What she didn’t do was go straight to Luna. Just she paused in the threshold, and saw a kind of loneliness for which no soothing phrase could ever serve as an antidote.

What lingered with Julia, however, was not Luna’s pale skin or the wispy hair regrowing. It was something she could not quite name that was missing from behind her eyes. It was the idea that Luna was right there but really far away at the same time. Julia was all too familiar with that sensation. She’s also known it once herself, coming home with nothing in her hands.

So she waited.

One day, she placed a little music box on Luna’s bed. When it was played, Luna would slightly turn her head, enough so she’d show awareness. Julia read from the hallway because she didn’t want to put any pressure on the girl.

A few weeks into it, Richard began to feel a shift he couldn’t quite put his finger on. Julia did not make the house noisy, but she made it warm. One evening he found Luna cradling the music box in her palms, and he thanked Julia for that gift that seemed like it mattered to his daughter.

Weeks passed, and trust began to establish itself. Luna let Julia brush her newly grown hair. Then, in a single still moment, all changed.

“It hurts… don’t touch me, mommy.”

Julia froze… This was the first time she heard the little girl speak.

Julia set the brush down gently and said nothing more than, “Okay. We’ll stop.”

Over the next few days patterns started to emerge. When someone walked and Luna would hear footsteps, she’d react to them and she’d turn her head around. It was the same with the voices. But one thing that Julia noticed and which worried her was that Luna’s mood declined after she received certain medication.

And then, one day, after paying Luna a visit together with nurses and other doctors, Dr. Morrow left behind the huge folder in which he was writing down the changes in Luna and her treatment after every visit.

Julia started calling his name with the folder in the hands, but the doctor had already left. So Julia’s curiosity arouse and she started reading the papers that were neatly piled one over another.

To her, the entire situation felt awkward from the beginning, and this was her chance calm her mind. But the moment she started going through the papers, she knew something was terribly wrong.

One of the documents read that the “trial” was founded by certain pharmaceutical companies. Julia had no idea Luna was part of a trial treatment, and it turned out that neither Richard was aware of that.

The files of the medications Luna was taking felt suspicious, too. Some of them were labeled “Restrictive use only,” although Luna was taking them every single day, sometimes even twice a day. Others were labeled “Clinical trial only.” There were dates that didn’t align with Luna’s current treatment plan. But Luna’s name was there, on every single one of the papers.

That night, Julia perched on the edge of her bed with her lap top on her knees.The glow lit up her hands as she typed the names of drugs she barely knew how to pronounce.

The results were worse than she feared.

One drug had been approved only for adults in late-stage trials. Another was removed from the market in several countries following reports of organ suppression. A third wasn’t even licensed at all but was still experimental, its data incomplete, its risks “under evaluation.”

The phrase repeated again and again on medical forums and in buried reports: “It should only be used if other options are unavailable.”

Julia hung on the screen. As she read, more and more pieces clicked into place. Luna had always had other options. There had always been a way to help her. And the drugs—those drugs—explained it all. The emptiness she’d glimpsed in Luna, the way she looked remote, even hollow… it wasn’t the disease. It was the medication.

Julia didn’t sleep that night. She replayed every nurse’s movements in her mind, every hush-hush command, every strange glance. One followed orders without question, another ignored the labels, one avoided her eyes entirely. And each time, her thoughts went straight to Dr. Morrow whose name appeared everywhere. It was on the approvals, the dosage increases, in notes justifying the continuation of treatment despite Luna’s worsening condition.

When Richard finally got around to reading the files, what Julia had already suspected became undeniable. They had been declaring Luna terminal too soon. That label had closed doors and offered no other options. Once that door was shut, anything could be sanctioned as “the last hope.”

And the test results confirmed the nightmare. The doses weren’t intended to cure; they were intended to suppress. Luna hadn’t been failing on her own. Her body had been kept in a kind of synthetic decline long enough for everyone to assume that it was untreatable.

“So she was never… she was never beyond salvation?” Richard asked. The response was calm, matter-of-fact—but it hit harder than anything: “No. She was never dying the way you were told.”

Someone had treated Luna as data, as collateral, and nearly got away with it. The worst part? How easily everyone had been persuaded not to ask questions. That silence, that blind faith… it had almost cost a child her life.

Please SHARE this article with your family and friends on Facebook.

Bored Daddy

Love and Peace

James Van Der Beek shared one colon cancer symptom that led to tragic diagnosis and death

0

Dawson’s Creek star James Van Der Beek passed away aged 48, sending shockwaves through the entertainment world.

Van Der Beek was battling colon cancer for nearly three years, and his passing brought the question of why so many young people are getting diagnosed with this form of cancer back into the limelight.

The Mirror reported Dr. Will Bulsiewicz, a gastroenterologist who goes by the Gut Health MD online, said the actor’s death “didn’t need to happen.”

In a post on the social media in which he shared his tributes to the late actor, Dr. Bulsiewicz aslo wrote, “He was 48, and this didn’t need to happen.

“James Van Der Beek died from colorectal cancer, and right now, colon cancer is rising in younger adults.”

He further wrote, “But you need to know: this is often preventable. That’s why we lowered the screening age from 50 to 45. If you’re 45 or older, you don’t wait for symptoms; you get screened. And if you have a family history, you start even earlier.

“But at any age, if you have bleeding, a change in bowel habits, unexplained anaemia, persistent abdominal pain, or unexplained weight loss – don’t ignore it. Get checked. As a gastroenterologist, I’ve removed pre-cancerous polyps that would have become cancer.

“That’s what a colonoscopy can do. It can prevent cancer or catch it early when it’s most curable. So I’m asking you, please book the colonoscopy. The earlier the better. Do it for yourself, do it for your family, and help me share this message.”

Van Der Beek’s passing was confirmed by his family, who said in a statement, “Our beloved James David Van Der Beek passed peacefully this morning. He met his final days with courage, faith, and grace.

“There is much to share regarding his wishes, love for humanity, and the sacredness of time. Those days will come. For now we ask for peaceful privacy as we grieve our loving husband, father, son, brother, and friend.”

Van Der Beek was diagnosed with colon cancer in 2023 and was candid about his battle with the disease.

Speaking to People magazine in 2024, Van Der Beek spoke of disclosing his diagnosis with the public, saying he was in “a good place and feeling strong.”

At the beginning, he had been dealing with the disease privately, but had “found it helpful and cathartic to share things publicly,” he told the publication. He added that he wanted to raise awareness about colon cancer.

“I’d always associated cancer with age and with unhealthy, sedentary lifestyles,” Van Der Beek told People. “But I was in amazing cardiovascular shape. I tried to eat healthy — or as far as I knew it at the time.”

Getty Images

He shared that one of the first symptoms he noticed, which is also the case with many other people who suffer from the same disease, were changes to his bowel movement. He brushed that symptom off at the beginning because he thought it was due to his coffee drinking habit, but even after he stopped having coffee, the irregularities in his bowel movement continued.

“When I cut that out and it didn’t improve, I thought, ‘All right, I better get this checked out,'” he said.

He was diagnosed with colon cancer following colonoscopy.

“Then the gastroenterologist said — in his most pleasant bedside manner — that it was cancer,” he said. “I think I went into shock.”

The actor added, “The trickiest thing is there are so many unknowns with cancer.

“You think, ‘How do I fix this? Is this healing me? Is this hurting me? Is this working? Is it coming back?’ As someone who likes answers, not knowing is one of the hardest things.”

In recent years, more people under the age of 50 have been diagnosed with bowel cancer, a rise that researchers believe may be linked to changes in lifestyle, environmental factors, or even genetics.

This type of cancer was once seen mostly in older adults, but as cases among younger people continue to grow, experts are rethinking when screenings should begin and how treatment should be approached.

As per the American Cancer Society, colorectal cancer starts in the colon. “Most colorectal cancers start as a growth on the inner lining of the colon or rectum. These growths are called polyps.”

While polyps are quite common and often noncancerous, some can turn into cancer over time.

Dr. Jeremy Kortmansky of Yale School of Medicine explains that colorectal cancer typically exhibits aggressive histological features, which is why it is often diagnosed in later stages.

The symptoms can be rectal bleeding, changes in bowel habits, diarrhea, or constipation. It is very likely these symptoms to be mistaken for less severe issues like hemorrhoids or irritable bowel syndrome.

Rebecca Siegel from the American Cancer Society believes that the increase of early-onset colorectal cancer at young people can be related to the lifestyle changes introduced in the mid-20th century.

The Western diet has indeed changed dramatically over the years and it now includes more processed foods and sugars, particularly high-fructose corn syrup, that began to be a widely used product in the 70s. Researchers attribute this change to obesity and metabolic diseases, both risk factors for colorectal cancer.

A sedentary lifestyle is another risk factor

Research indicates that it could be years before such changes produce cancer, which accounts for the incident increase in this type of cancer in young people.

Genetics, too, play a significant role, just like with any form of cancer out there.

Obesity increases cancer risk by altering hormones like insulin, promoting cell growth. Chronic inflammation caused by fat tissue also contributes to this risk. A study in JAMA Oncology found that obesity nearly doubles the risk of early-onset colorectal cancer.

John Marshall of Georgetown University’s Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, who has treated cancer patients for more than three decades, said, “We’re now starting to see more and more people in the 20-, 30- and 40-year-old range developing colon cancer. At the beginning of my career, nobody that age had colorectal cancer,” adding that the shift “is shaking us all, to be blunt.”

Please SHARE this article with your family and friends on Facebook.

Bored Daddy

Love and Peace

Princess Diana’s last words disclosed by firefighter who responded on scene

0

Known as the People’s Princess because of her nurturing and compassionate nature, as well as love for the ordinary citizens, Lady Di will forever be remembered as the woman who changed Britain and the Monarchy.

This incredible Princess rose to prominence upon her engagement to Prince Charles, Queen Elizabeth II’s eldest son and heir apparent to the British throne. Ever since the world learned of her, she was under the spotlight. The paparazzi followed her every move, and according to many, pushed her to her death.

Wikipedia Commons

At the time of her death, Princess Diana’s sons, Harry and William, were only 12 and 15 years.

She lost her life after she and her partner Dodi Fayed, the son of Egyptian billionaire Mohamed Al-Fayed, her driver Henri Paul, and her bodyguard Trevor Rees-Jones crashed the Mercedes in the Pont de I’Alma tunnel in Paris while trying to escape the paparazzi.

Shutterstock. The Pont de l’Alma tunnel where Princess Diana was fatally injured in the car crash. Above the tunnel you can now see the Flame of Freedom of Liberty, now a tribute to the Princess.

Xavier Gourmelon was one of the first responders who came to the scene after the tragic crash. He spoke of the day and revealed what Princess Diana’s final words were.

As reported by The Independent, Gourmelon said: “The car was in a mess and we just dealt with it like any road accident.”

He then continued, “For me this was simply a banal traffic accident, one of many that emergency services have to deal with and it was the usual causes, speed and a drunk driver…

“I could see she had a slight injury to her right shoulder but, other than that, there was nothing significant. There was no blood on her at all. I held her hand and told her to be calm and keep still, I said I was there to help and reassured her.”

As she was still conscious when he approached her to help her, the Princess said: “My God, what’s happened?”

Shutterstock

Gourmelon further said how he believed the Princess would pull through and was shocked to hear that she died one day after she was admitted to the Pitie-Salpetriere hospital. According to reports, Lady Di passed away as a result of massive internal injuries and a ruptured blood vessel which caused internal bleeding.

Her funeral was watched by 2.3 billion people from all over the world. Diana’s passing was a loss that crushed billions of hearts. There was no single Briton who didn’t mourn her death.

Dodi Fayed’s father, Mohamed Al-Fayed, whose son died at the scene, was convinced that the crash was no incident at all.

Princess Diana will forever be missed by many. May she rest in peace.

Please SHARE this article with your family and friends on Facebook.

Bored Daddy

Love and Peace

Taking morning baths after 70: potential liver risks you should be aware of

0

Taking a bath daily is what most people consider a healthy practice. Of course, there are also those who shower more than once per day, but there are also those who tend to skip a day or two.

However, while taking a bath feels like a simple daily task, it can have some health consequences on the elderly.

When people reach a certain age, usually 70 and above, their bodily functions tend to slow down. It is also the age when the body becomes more vulnerable to changes in temperature and circulation, so taking baths first thing in the morning can put stress on the liver and increase the risk of liver-related conditions. While the act of showering isn’t harmful on its own, the timing can be.

Here are some liver-related risks seniors should know about if they often bathe in the morning.

1. Reduced Blood Flow to the Liver

As we get older, the body doesn’t adapt to sudden changes the way it once did. What the elderly should have in mind is that circulation slows, blood pressure becomes more sensitive, and internal organs rely on a narrower margin of balance. That’s why something as simple as a very hot bath, especially early in the morning, can have a stronger effect on older adults than they might expect.

When you step into hot water, blood vessels near the skin widen quickly. This pulls blood toward the surface of the body and away from deeper organs. According to experts at Harvard Medical School, heat exposure causes blood vessels to dilate and temporarily alters how blood is distributed throughout the body. While this response can feel relaxing, it also lowers blood pressure and reduces circulation to internal organs for a short time.

For younger, healthy people, the body usually compensates without issue. In older adults, especially first thing in the morning when blood pressure is already lower, this adjustment can be slower and less efficient. Doctors at the Cleveland Clinic note that hot baths can significantly lower blood pressure, which may lead to lightheadedness, weakness, or reduced organ perfusion in seniors.

The liver may be particularly affected. Research published in the Journal of Hepatology found that exposure to hot water reduced portal blood flow, the circulation that supplies the liver. In people with liver conditions such as fatty liver disease, hepatitis, or early cirrhosis, this temporary reduction may increase liver strain and slow detoxification processes.

None of this means older adults need to avoid bathing altogether. The issue is temperature and timing. Very hot water early in the day places extra demands on circulation when the body is least prepared to adapt. Warm baths later in the day are generally better tolerated and less disruptive to blood flow.

2. Higher Risk of Fatty Liver Worsening

Hot baths first thing in the morning may feel refreshing, but for older adults they can place stress on the body. Exposure to very warm water causes blood vessels to widen quickly, which can lead to a sudden drop in blood pressure. In people over the age of 70, the body is often slower to compensate for these rapid shifts, increasing the risk of dizziness, weakness, or reduced blood flow to vital organs.

This effect can be more pronounced in individuals with metabolic conditions such as type 2 diabetes. Diabetes already affects blood vessel health and circulation, and adding an abrupt temperature change early in the day can further strain the system. For some, this extra stress may worsen existing liver conditions, particularly fatty liver disease.

Fatty liver disease develops when excess fat builds up in liver cells, often linked to insulin resistance and metabolic imbalance. While it may start without obvious symptoms, ongoing stress on the liver can accelerate progression. Over time, untreated fatty liver disease can lead to inflammation, scarring of liver tissue known as fibrosis, and eventually reduced liver function. This can interfere with the body’s ability to regulate blood sugar, process medications, and remove toxins.

For older adults, especially those managing diabetes or liver conditions, it may be safer to avoid very hot baths in the morning. Choosing warm water instead, bathing later in the day, and allowing the body time to fully wake up can help reduce unnecessary strain and support overall metabolic and liver health.

3. Hepatitis Reactivation Triggers

There are cases of older adults who live with inactive hepatitis B or C without even being aware of it. So, sudden exposure to very hot or very cold water in the morning can act as a physical stressor that can challenge their immune system. In rare cases, this stress may disrupt the body’s balance and trigger viral activity. When that happens, it can cause liver inflammation and worsen any existing liver conditions. While this is an uncommon outcome, it does serve as a reminder to avoid extremes.

4. Strain on a Cirrhotic Liver

Bathing for older adults with cirrhosis is among those tasks that can prove particularly daunting. Cirrhosis also decreases the liver’s ability to cleanse the body of toxins, reduces albumin levels, and interferes with blood clotting. An abrupt hot bath, especially before getting up in the morning, can overburden the circulatory system. The blood rushes to the skin in large volumes, temporarily diminishing circulation to the internal organs, ovaries and uterus, and the liver.

This transition can bring about swelling and fatigue and make you feel sluggish before the day has even started. Over time, strain on an already compromised liver could potentially lead to severe complications, such as hepatic encephalopathy, where toxins build up and impair brain function.

For elderly cirrhotic patients, using a thermostat to bring the temperature up to a moderate warmth and bathing later in the day may do the liver no harm. It allows the patient to attend to daily hygiene without overextending herself, reducing unnecessary discomfort and supporting a more comfortable posture.

5. Increased Risk of Gallbladder and Bile Flow Problems

The liver and gallbladder work closely together to produce, store, and release bile, which is essential for digesting fats and removing certain toxins from the body. In older adults, this delicate system can become more sensitive to sudden stress, including rapid changes in temperature. Taking a very hot or very cold bath early in the morning can temporarily disrupt blood flow and circulation, which may interfere with how these organs function.

For people prone to gallstones or bile duct issues, this can be particularly problematic. Sudden temperature changes may cause the gallbladder to contract or the bile ducts to react in ways that worsen discomfort or trigger a flare-up. Over time, repeated stress could increase the risk of complications, such as inflammation or pain associated with gallstones, and may make existing bile duct problems harder to manage.

Elderly individuals or those with known liver or gallbladder conditions should be cautious with extreme-temperature baths, especially early in the day. Opting for a gently warm bath, rather than very hot or cold water, and bathing later in the morning or afternoon allows the body to adjust more gradually. This simple adjustment helps support healthy bile flow while maintaining comfort and reducing unnecessary strain on the liver and gallbladder.

6. Dehydration and Toxin Accumulation

A number of seniors begin the day already mildly dehydrated because water is lost from the body overnight due to breathing and sweating along with normal metabolic activities. Soaking in a hot tub first thing in the day can exacerbate the dehydration, as heat induces further fluid loss through perspiration and directs blood flow away from the muscles to the surface of the skin. Older people can feel the impact of mild dehydration as well—tiredness, dizziness, and slower circulation are just a few symptoms.

Hydration is especially important for the liver, which depends on adequate blood flow to perform its detoxification duties effectively. The liver may also receive added strain when the body is dehydrated, as dehydration reduces blood flow to the body’s internal organs. When you combine dehydration with the abrupt circulatory shifts caused by a hot bath, it can magnify these effects, reduce liver efficiency, and make you feel heavy, fatigued, or sluggish first thing in the morning.

For this reason, experts advise that seniors hydrate before bathing by drinking a glass of water as soon as they wake up. Waiting a few minutes after rising for the body to ‘wake up’ before entering the bath and selecting a warm rather than scalding temperature may also help ease the strain on circulation. Small changes like these can make a real difference—helping the liver work its best, fueling overall energy, and making daily hygiene safer and more comfortable for aging adults.

Conclusion

If you are 70 or above wait at least an hour after waking up to take a bath. Further, bath with lukewarm water, make sure you stay hydrated, and limit bath time to 10-15 minutes at maximum.

Please SHARE this article with your family and friends on Facebook.

Bored Daddy

Love and Peace

Studies suggest people with a certain blood type may have a greater chance of reaching 100

0

The 2024 Revision of World Population Prospects states that the number of centenarians, people who reach to live to 100 or beyond, has roughly doubled every decade since 1950 globally. Further, it is expected the number to quintuple between 2022 and 2050.

Extended lifespan is the product of a complex and multifactorial interaction of several parameters, a large number of which are still unknown.

While genetic predisposition is an important factor, a person’s lifespan is also influenced by lifestyle, environment, and social relationships. The exact reasons why some people become centenarians and others do not remain largely unknown, which makes this a fascinating topic to discuss and research.

Ultimately, understanding what supports lifespan and healthspan in these exceptional individuals may point the way toward extending good health and longevity.

These research enable us not only to better understand how aging processes develop over the course of life, but also to gain knowledge on how exceptional longevity may be facilitated. In the end, identifying what supports both lifespan and health span in these extraordinary individuals may lead to ways to extend good health and longevity.

Reaching 100? Insights from a Groundbreaking Swedish Study

Centenarians were once those people whose birthdays became community events or even newspaper features. Even today, hitting a century of life is rare, and scientists have long wondered why some people live far longer than others. Is it luck? Genetics? Lifestyle? Or a combination of all three?

A study from Sweden gives us a glimpse into the answer. Researchers had access to decades of health records for tens of thousands of people, and they wanted to know whether routine blood tests taken in midlife could reveal who might eventually make it to 100.

Decades of Tracking

The study looked at 44,637 people from Stockholm County. These participants, all born between 1893 and 1920 (ages 64 to 99), had routine blood tests performed between 1985 and 1996. After that, the researchers followed these individuals for up to 35 years, tracking disease, death, and residency through national registers.

Out of all these participants, 1,224 reached the age of 100, and most of them, around 85 percent, were women. This didn’t come as a surprise as women generally live longer than men. But the researchers weren’t just counting birthdays. They also wanted to know if blood markers measured decades earlier could reveal something deeper about their longevity.

It turns out they could.

The Markers That Matter

The study examined 12 routine blood markers. They were glucose and total cholesterol for metabolic health, creatinine for kidney function, liver enzymes including gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), and lactate dehydrogenase (LD), iron markers, and uric acid, which may be a sign of inflammation, and albumin, a proxy for nutrition and protein intake.

The results showed very clearly that extreme values, both too high or too low, were associated with a lower probability of reaching 100.

As researcher Karin Modig explained in a Live Science article:

“We found that, on the whole, those who made it to their hundredth birthday tended to have lower levels of glucose, creatinine, and uric acid from their 60s onwards. For example, very few of the centenarians had a glucose level above 6.5 earlier in life, or a creatinine level above 125.”

It indicates that even a small edge in midlife, sustained over years, can bring about a subtle shift in the odds of reaching extreme longevity.

Cholesterol and Iron: Moderation Is Key

Clinical practice guidelines often recommend aggressive cholesterol lowering, but the Swedish study demonstrated something more nuanced. Higher total cholesterol levels were actually associated with a modest increase in the probability of surviving to age 100. The researchers commented that this result is consistent with prior research indicating that elevated cholesterol may, on occasion, be beneficial in the very elderly.

Iron levels showed a similar pattern. Very low iron was linked to lower odds of living to 100. The lesson here is that extremes aren’t ideal. A steady, moderate range is what seems to matter most.

Kidney function was also significant. Those who lived the longest generally had healthier kidneys in midlife, allowing their bodies to process toxins, medications, and blood pressure for decades. Liver function was important too, but not as drastically. Inflammation was consistently reduced in centenarians and supercentenarians. Less inflammation may help keep organs and tissues resilient as the years tick by.

Unsplash

The Role of Genetics

Genes clearly play a part in longevity. Other studies reviewed alongside the Swedish research highlight variants in genes like FOXO3A, which regulates stress resistance and insulin signaling; APOE and PON1, which affect cardiovascular health and lipid metabolism; and TP53 and P21, which help control cell cycles and protect against age-related damage.

Blood type, while fixed from birth, may have a minor influence as well. Certain types could slightly affect disease risk or clotting, but they don’t determine whether someone lives to 100. The story of longevity is far more complex than one gene or one blood type alone.

Modig notes: “The study does not allow conclusions about which lifestyle factors or genes are responsible for the biomarker values. However, it is reasonable to think that factors such as nutrition and alcohol intake play a role. Keeping track of your kidney and liver values, as well as glucose and uric acid as you get older, is probably not a bad idea.”

She adds: “That said, chance probably plays a role at some point in reaching an exceptional age. But the fact that differences in biomarkers could be observed a long time before death suggests that genes and lifestyle may also play a role.”

Unsplash

What This Means for You

So what does this all mean for the rest of us? The short answer is that you don’t need perfect lab results to live a long life. Also, you don’t need to obsess over numbers or chase extremes. What matters most is steady, consistent habits over time.

Blood sugar is one example. Avoid constant spikes from sugary snacks and drinks. Meals with protein, fiber, and healthy fats can help keep things steady. Kidneys and liver are quietly working hard, so drink enough water, be mindful of medications, limit alcohol, and eat nutrient-rich foods. Cholesterol and iron are similar: extremes aren’t helpful, and moderate levels appear to support longevity. Inflammation can be reduced with movement, good sleep, stress management, and a diet rich in vegetables and fruits.

The big idea is that small, steady habits add up. A slightly better meal, an extra walk, or a night of restful sleep quietly tips the odds in your favor over decades. Longevity isn’t about chasing perfection. It’s about letting the little things compound.

Beyond the Numbers

One of the most impressive aspects of this study is how long it followed people. This wasn’t a survey or a one-time snapshot. It tracked decades of data, showing how what happens in midlife—blood sugar, kidney function, inflammation—can shape outcomes decades later.

Longevity is rarely about a single factor. Genes, biomarkers, daily habits, and even a little luck all combine. No single thing guarantees you’ll live to 100, but a lifetime of balanced choices definitely improves your odds.

Even blood type, while eye-catching in headlines, is just one small piece of the puzzle. The bigger picture is consistency: steady habits, stable organ function, and taking care of your body year after year.

Unsplash

The Human Lesson

Ultimately, this isn’t about obsessing over lab results. The centenarians in the Swedish study weren’t perfect. They had variations in diet, lifestyle, and genetics. What set them apart was decades of generally balanced health, the quiet advantages that accumulate over time.

“It’s about living well every day, letting your habits compound over time,” Modig says.

Balanced meals, a good night’s sleep, regular walks, and small efforts to manage stress all add up.

No one can promise you’ll reach 100, but paying attention to your health, avoiding extremes, and sticking to habits you can maintain really does make a difference. The small choices you make today can add up in ways you might not expect.

Please SHARE this article with your family and friends on Facebook.

Bored Daddy

Love and Peace